Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) condemns the newly agreed upon deal between the European Union and Turkey, which will prevent people from finding safe passage to European shores, worsen the humanitarian suffering already evident, and represent a failure to uphold responsibilities nations have under International Humanitarian Law:
It’s obvious that this deal is designed with the single aim of stopping the arrival of people into the EU. The rights and well-being of people themselves are not a primary consideration. The logic of stopping the boats, turning people back, and outsourcing "management" to Turkey is unacceptable.
Regardless of the legality of such a deal, MSF questions if forcibly returning people to a country already hosting the highest number of refugees in the world is a responsible strategy.
Today, access to safety in Turkey is not guaranteed for people fleeing neighboring Syria, as the border has been closed for some time. If this agreement results in even more difficulties for people to flee wars and hardship to find protection it would be a too high price to pay. The European Member States should realize the humanitarian consequences of such a dramatic decision. Respect for peoples' right to seek asylum and to obtain proper assistance and protection is fundamental.
An interview with Aurélie Ponthieu, an MSF Humanitarian Affairs Advisor:
Note: This interview was conducted a few hours before word came down that the deal had been struck.
European and Turkish leaders are currently meeting to discuss a controversial deal. What is your opinion on these new proposed measures?
The proposed deal with Turkey shows once again how European leaders have completely lost track of reality.
These people are not numbers, but men, women, children and families. Around 88 percent of those using this route are coming from refugee producing countries, and more than half of them are women and children. They should be treated humanely and in full respect of their rights and dignity.
What could be the immediate humanitarian consequences of these measures?
We are already seeing regular violations of people’s dignity Greece and across the Balkans: arbitrary push-backs, violence at borders, inhumane reception conditions. Despite what the EU council might say, a plan that aims at stopping these people from seeking asylum in Europe and returns them in huge numbers to Turkey, a country that is already hosting close to 3 million registered refugees, is likely to cause more suffering and is also completely unrealistic.
The response cannot be to turn our back on thousands of people who have fled war and persecution, create a humanitarian crisis in Greece, and throw money to solve the problem.
What is the situation in Greece today? Will Greece be able to cope with the situation?
Europe seems to hope that the creation of another humanitarian crisis, this time in Greece, will deter others from coming. This is shortsighted and cruel. The existing infrastructure in Greece is already overwhelmed and as we speak, more than 40,000 men, women and children are currently stranded in the country.
At least 12,000 are at the Greek border town of Idomeni where our teams are seeing dramatic scenes of children born on Europe’s soil, then being forced to sleep in tents in the cold. The efforts of humanitarian organizations and volunteers to improve shelter capacities will be completely in vain if hundreds of thousands end up stranded in Greece.
The EU proposed to support both Turkey and Greece through humanitarian aid programs. What do you think of these plans?
With these new plans, the EU is only trying to alleviate the humanitarian consequences of its members' irresponsible actions. EU humanitarian aid is becoming a tool for Europe to “contain” refugees and migrants away from its shores. This is unacceptable.
Humanitarian assistance should be based on needs, not on political agendas and it will never represent an acceptable solution to the failure of European governments to adopt humane migration and asylum policies.
The EU-Turkey deal, presented as the solution to the so-called “crisis” affecting Europe, is a perfect illustration of this dangerous approach. The Voluntary Humanitarian admission scheme put forward for Syrians in Turkey is not based on refugees’ needs for assistance and protection but on Turkey’s ability to stop “migration” to Europe. At a time when millions of people in the world are displaced, it is shameful that the only safe passage offered by the EU is conditional to the number of people they can send back.
What do you think should be the right approach to respond to the current crisis then?
Our experience clearly shows that despite hastily built fences and barbed wire, people will continue to find ways to reach Europe. While European leaders continue to focus on the wrong strategy, they are only exacerbating the causes of their own policy-made crisis: the lack of safe and legal channels forcing people to sea and into the hands of smugglers and the “first country of entry” rule putting unfair pressure on southern European countries and forcing people to transit on unsafe journeys through Europe.
There has been no response to these highly problematic deficiencies. Relocation, a safe way to exit Greece and its dysfunctional asylum and reception system, is not functioning. Only 937 asylum seekers have been relocated out of the 160,000 promised and only 4,555 resettled out of 20,000.
The EU-Turkey deal and the deployment of EU humanitarian aid to Greece will be no quick fix to the need people have to find safety and protection in Europe. It is time European governments start facing reality and provide a responsible, common, humane and dignified response to people’s unstoppable search for protection and a better life for themselves and for their children, by providing a safe passage for those in need in dignity.