– The question posed to MSF staff by a women in
Diyala, Iraq, in May 2003
International staff (as of July, 2003): 20 National staff (as of July, 2003): 108
This simple question reveals one of the
legacies of the war in Iraq: an erosion of the
meaning of the word "humanitarian." Invoked
by the United States and the United Kingdom
as one motivation behind the war (ridding the
country of a tyrant), ignored or manipulated
by Saddam Hussein, used as an argument for
paci. sm by NGOs (the disastrous humanitarian
consequences of war would be too great), the
essence of the "humanitarian" idea took quite
a blow, to the ultimate detriment of those who
may have needed assistance.
MSF understands humanitarian action to
be a response to conflict. Aid or relief for
humanitarian reasons is assistance given
independently and impartially, based on
need alone, not tied to political agenda,
ethnic identity or religious affiliation. It is not
tied to being "liberated" or being on one side
or another of a conflict.
In Iraq, the concept of humanitarian action
was put to the forefront to either justify,
prevent, or "spin" hostilities. Humanitarian
aid became just another instrument of war,
blurring the lines between independent
humanitarian aid, military obligation and
propaganda.
In terms of the way it was fought, the war
was also packaged as a "humane" war; yet
the circumstances of some civilian deaths in
Iraq require investigation.
Declining to comment on the possibility of
a humanitarian emergency in the event of war in Iraq, MSF chose instead to do everything
to be present when war hit, to be in a
position to better understand the suffering
of the people in the event of war and provide
medical assistance if any were needed.
Active in the country in the early 1990s, MSF
left in June 1992 because of inability to work
independently under Saddam Hussein's
regime. MSF was prevented by the Iraqi
government from establishing a presence in
the intervening years. Finally, as war loomed
in late 2002 and early 2003, MSF was able
to restart negotiations and was granted
permission to begin work in March 2003.
As the US-led coalition began bombing Iraq,
a team of six expatriates, including a surgical
team, was on the ground in Baghdad, hoping
to assist already highly trained Iraqi medical
workers who could possibly need support in
event of war. There was not much possibility
to bring independent assistance in the run-up
and opening days of the war. Nonetheless, the team began assisting Iraqi staff at al-Kindi
hospital in northeast Baghdad. MSF teams in
Jordan, Kuwait, Syria and Iran prepared for
possible out. ows of refugees.
At the beginning of April, just as increasing
numbers of wounded people were arriving
at al-Kindi hospital, two MSF expatriates
and one local staff member were taken by
the Iraqi secret police. All activities were
suspended until their release by their
captors nine days later, just after the fall of
Baghdad. Ultimately, the main hostilities of
the war lasted a little over . ve weeks.
Real needs – but no humanitarian crisis
With the team safely reunited, MSF began
a general assessment of the health situation,
visiting hospitals and clinics in many areas of
the country. During April and May, expanded
MSF teams conducted brief assessments of
health facilities in 25 cities, donating supplies
and equipment and assisting medical staff
as needed. In visits to more than 70 health
facilities, MSF teams witnessed none of
the characteristics of a major humanitarian
crisis, such as massive displacements of
people, famine or widespread epidemics.
There were no large refugee flows. MSF
did, however, assist a group of about 1,000
refugees from Iran (in Iraq since 1980) caught
in the no-man's land between Iraq and Jordan
in precarious conditions.
An unacceptable number of lives
Despite the lack of acute humanitarian
needs, MSF was nevertheless alarmed. The
most urgent medical problem in Iraq was the
lack of leadership in the highly centralized
health system, which had slipped into chaos
in the aftermath of the war. With no central
organization, the medical infrastructure in
Iraq had begun to deteriorate. MSF spoke
out about the situation, calling on the
occupying power to address the health needs
of the Iraqi people and to establish some
sort of order within the health system, in
compliance with international humanitarian
law. According to the Geneva Conventions it
is the responsibility of the occupying power
to meet the basic needs, including health
care, of civilians in an occupied area.
"The lack of leadership and lack of
intervention," said MSF International Council
President Morten Rostrup, a doctor on the MSF team in Baghdad during the war, "has
cost an unacceptable amount of lives."
Many patients had been discharged from
hospitals during the bombing and were afraid
to return for secondary surgery or follow-up
treatment. Widespread looting stripped
many public hospitals of all equipment
and drugs; insecure streets prevented the
medical staff in some areas from coming to
work. Iraqis with chronic diseases such as
diabetes no longer had access to life-saving
medicines, and limited water and electricity
in parts of the country were also contributing
to the health problems.
MSF's efforts to support principal hospitals
in Baghdad and elsewhere were at first
impeded, however. When the main hostilities
ended, hospitals quickly became coveted
prizes in tense political struggles between
hospital administrators and directors,
coalition members, and local religious
leaders. Such conditions made it virtually
impossible to provide meaningful added
value through these structures at the time. In
May, however, MSF was able to begin work in
al-Thawra hospital in Sadr City, Baghdad.
MSF opens primary health centers in
Baghdad slums
"Many people get their water from wells
that are so filthy that when you look down
into them you see layers of garbage"
– Pierre
Boulet-Desbareau, Head of Mission for Iraq,
June 2003
By June 2003, the medical infrastructure
in Iraq had deteriorated even further, with
shortages of drugs caused by the collapse
of the distribution system and widespread
looting. MSF responded by supporting the
fragile medical structure in several parts of
the country. In Basra and Missan, MSF began
assistance to 16 health centers, providing
essential drugs and supplies and rehabilitating
buildings destroyed during the bombing.
MSF also began a primary health care
project in the slums of al-Ma'amil and
al-Muntadhr in Sadr City, one of the poorest
areas of Baghdad. An estimated 300,000
people live in shantytowns in the area, many
in metallic shacks on garbage dumps. With
no access to medical care, clean water or
sanitation, the health situation is critical
and the potential for outbreaks of disease
is enormous. The people living here are desperate for medical services: MSF teams
carried out 138 consultations in one day
when the first of three clinics opened; by
early September, teams were carrying out an
average of 2,500 consultations each week.
At al-Thawra hospital, also in Sadr City,
MSF is working on the emergency ward. MSF
is also focusing on safer nursing techniques,
organizing practical training sessions, and
supervising nurses and junior doctors on
the wards.
In addition to providing direct medical
services, MSF is working together with the
Iraqi Ministry of Health to improve the health
situation of the people in Sadr City. Activities
include creating a surveillance system to
track infectious diseases and provide an early
warning system for outbreaks, and improving
access to water and sanitation facilities.
Uncertain future
By late summer 2003, basic services such
as health care – and water and electricity
– were still not being ensured by the
Coalition Provisional Authority or the Iraqi
Governing Council. The security situation
was deteriorating, with stepped-up attacks
not only on Coalition forces but on symbols
of the western presence in Iraq, including
aid workers. MSF teams in Basra were
evacuated in August as the situation in that
city became increasingly unstable (national
staff completed the distribution of drugs to
health centers and hospitals).
Perhaps the most visible reminders of the
lingering problems are the brutal bombings of
the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad
in August and the International Committee of
the Red Cross headquarters in October. MSF
was shocked by the deaths of large numbers
of Iraqi and international staff. These assaults
were a tragic illustration of how continuing
violence is severely limiting the ability of
humanitarian organizations and international
agencies to assist the Iraqi people.
Ironically, if war as such didn't create a
humanitarian emergency, the failure of the
victors to ensure basic security and provide
essential services for civilians ultimately
created many more needs than would have
otherwise been the case.
Table of
Contents
The
Year in Review Rafael Vilasanjuan,
MSF Secretary General Dr. Morten Rostrup, President,
MSF International Council